. A dialogue that inspired this project:
Mikhail: So, Mike, what do you think?
Mike: why do you think that I can think?
Mikhail: Well, you are my second ‘I’, you exist, and consequently, you can think.
Mike: ‘consequently’ from what?
Mikhail: Well, Descartes said: ‘I think, consequently, I am. I assume that the opposite it true, too: I am, consequently, I think. If there is something that can identify itself as an ‘I’, then that something is able of thinking.
Mike: ok. Let us try it this way: can you describe what ‘thinking’ is or point your finger at it?
Mikhail (after a long consideration): No, I cannot.
